Despite the few equality talks out there about men and women being equal partners, I still feel like men are given the director role and women are expected to take the following role. I don't like that at all. I want to be in a relationship where we both guide and follow each other. I think the directive style of communication should be used sparingly in relationships, if at all, and mainly with children.
------------------------------------------
Okay, so I wrote this really short blog post, and then I couldn't stop thinking about it. I fixated on the subject for a few days and then I rewrote this entry for a class discussion, except this time, with an edge of intolerance. The content barely differed from the above excerpt, but I was in a world of difference emotionally between this entry and that one. I was not happy.
I ended up calling a friend that day (a self-identified Mormon feminist male with a ginormous testimony) to talk it out. I just wanted to hear someone's thoughts who wouldn't feel the urge to shove their testimony down my throat without really hearing me. Because most my well-meaning friends would do just that or resist the urge for long enough for me to feel secure and then find a gap for their testimony. I get it. I really do. I have been that person many, many times. It's just not what I needed right then.
After listening to my concerns sans judgment and giving some of his own thoughts on the same subject, my friend tangentially shared the thought that faith is not to have a perfect knowledge of things and that sometimes we don't find the reassurances we seek immediately after the trial of our faith. It was that thought that led me to tears rather than the emotionally cluttered thoughts I shared initially (which thought process had begun as a rational venture. I think most trials of faith have rational beginnings. And you learn a lot by how you feel about new knowledge. The emotional reaction becomes a problem when it turns a concern into an obsession that rejects reason and/or consolation from God). It also gave me the opportunity for me to bare my testimony about how the Lord once blessed me with one reassurance long after numerous instances of knocking and waiting for one answer. When the answer came it was brief and a bit indirect, but given when I was most ready to receive it.
Not everything makes sense. We can blame a lot on semantics because it's easier to change the meaning of words than to change our worldviews. Whatever the real meaning behind the words in the Proclamation to the Family or other holy ordinances, there's probably a good reason why the Lord chose to use the specific words he used. One day everything will make sense. For now, I will try my best to follow the Spirit and blame the discrepancy of my understanding and the meaning of words on semantics and go on developing my dreams of Mormonism with a lens of feminism a more modern take on equality. I think my Heavenly Father is okay with that for now.
:)
Speaking of equality, I realized this weekend why I am so moved by contemporary dance pairs (after attending Evidance for like, the 4th time). Unlike ballroom where you have a leader and a follower, contemporary dance doesn't have a leading and following role. Both partners react to the movements of the other and they have equal power to influence the direction and flow of the dance. It's less pristine and structured, but it's more expressive and emotive than other paired dancing. It tells the story about a living human relationship while ballroom showcases a stuffy traditional ideal.
(I am so sorry if a dance person is reading this. I realize that I don't really know what I'm talking about and that my description/terminology is choppy and incomplete. Also, I still adore ballroom lots. I just really, really enjoy watching contemporary dance. And I like equality-like things.)








